Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Johnson v. Hu et al
as 2:2017cv00574
Plaintiff:
Mary Angela Johnson
Defendant:
Howard Hu, Chen Hu, Hu and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON et al v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2017cv00175
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES, INDIANA(S) CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES and STATE OF INDIANA
Plaintiff:
KRISTOPHER GEBHART, ANGELA JOHNSON, RAYMOND SCHOO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Jefferson County, Alabama et al
as 2:2016cv01459
Plaintiff:
Mary Angela Johnson
Defendant:
Jefferson County, Alabama, Dwight Sloan, Mike Hale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Homewood et al
as 2:2016cv01408
Plaintiff:
Mary Angela Johnson
Defendant:
City of Homewood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joiner v. Metro Transit Police et al
as 0:2016cv02006
Plaintiff:
Eugene Vincent Joiner
Defendant:
Metro Transit Police Dept , Hennepin County Detention Center , Wyatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00311
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv01932
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson, et. al., v. Shasta County, et. al.
as 2:2014cv01338
Plaintiff:
Bobby Darrell Johnson, Sharon Kay Johnson, Tanya Sueann Johnson and others
Defendant:
Erickson Cary, Tom Flemming, Ray Hughes and others
Respondent:
California Department of Justice
Not Classified By Court:
Mary Todd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
