Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01884
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Moore v. Revlon Consumer Products Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv06113
Plaintiff:
Angela Moore
Defendant:
Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, Revlon Group Holdings LLC, Revlon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JOYCE v. USDC JUDGES BETTY PUGH
as 1:2023cv00349
Plaintiff:
EDWIN WAYNE JOYCE
Defendant:
USDC JUDGES BETTY PUGH, ANGELA MOORE, HENRY ROGERS, JR-SR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOYCE v. MOORE, et al.,
as 1:2023cv00181
Plaintiff:
EDWIN WAYNE JOYCE
Defendant:
ANGELA MOORE, HENRY ROGERS, JR-SR, YVONNE CRAVEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Go Florida Investments Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Angela Moore
Defendant:
Go Florida Investments Inc. doing business as Roelens Vacation Rentals and Management doing business as Roelens Vacations and Koen Roelens
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
JOYCE v. PUGH et al
as 1:2022cv00992
Plaintiff:
EDWIN WAYNE JOYCE
Defendant:
USDC JUDGES BETTY PUGH, ANGELA MOORE, HENRY ROGERS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tutankhaman v. Moore
as 2:2022cv01596
Plaintiff:
King Michael Tutankhaman
Defendant:
Angela Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Moore v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00210
Plaintiff:
Angela Moore
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
