Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Love v. Michigan Property Resources et al
as 2:2023cv12944
Plaintiff:
Michell Love
Defendant:
Michigan Property Resources and Angela W Montgomery
Angela DeBoseIn re: Angela DeBose
as 23-12235
Petitioner:
In re: ANGELA W. DEBOSE
Respondent:
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Angela DeBoseIn re: Angela DeBose
as 23-10961
Petitioner:
In re: ANGELA W. DEBOSE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, CHIEF JUDGE, THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Angela W. DeBose v. USA, et al
as 22-13380
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANGELA W. DEBOSE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, RONALD FICARROTTA, Chief Judge, in official capacity and others
Stansberry v. Hovaw, et al
as 2:2022cv03136
Plaintiff:
Hunter D. Stansberry and Hunter Deagun Stansberry
Defendant:
Angela Hovaw and Angela W. Hovaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Horan v. Coen et al
as 1:2022cv02017
Plaintiff:
Myra Charlene Horan
Defendant:
Brad Lee Coen, Vicki J. Snelgrove, Angela W. Abstance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller et al v. Farley
as 2:2021cv00498
Plaintiff:
Eluster Miller and Angela W Miller
Defendant:
Newton Wesley Farley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Debose v. United States et al
as 8:2021cv02127
Plaintiff:
Angela Debose and Angela W. DeBose
Defendant:
United States, Thirteenth Judicial State Court, Thirteenth Judicial Circuit and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Miller et al v. Farley
as 7:2021cv02241
Plaintiff:
Eluster Miller and Angela W Miller
Defendant:
Newton Wesley Farley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Angela DeBose v. University of South Florida
as 20-12732
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA BOARD OF TRUSTEES and ELLUCIAN COMPANY, L.P.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANGELA W. DEBOSE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
