Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Stewart v. Aranas, et al.
as 23-3832
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LEWIS STEWART
Defendant / Appellant:
ROMEO ARANAS and FRANCISCO M. SANCHEZ
Defendant:
CHERYL BURSON, S.L. CLARK, JAMES COX and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02676
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Lewis Stewart v. Romeo Aranas, et al
as 20-15586
Defendant:
CHERYL BURSON, STATE OF NEVADA, S.L. CLARK and others
Defendant / Appellant:
BRIAN E. WILLIAMS, ROMEO ARANAS, JAMES COX and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LEWIS STEWART
S.P.S., ex rel, et al v. Raffensperger et al
as 1:2019cv04960
Plaintiff:
S.P.S., ex rel., Edwin Prior, DSCC and others
Defendant:
Anh Le, Brad Raffensperger, David Worley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patch of Land Lending LLC v. US Associates LLC et al
as 4:2017cv02598
Plaintiff:
Patch of Land Lending LLC
Defendant:
US Associates LLC, Mark S McAdams, Angie Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Stewart v. Aranas, et al.
as 3:2017cv00132
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, Cheryl Burson, S.L. Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Lewis Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Cox, et al.,
as 2:2015cv02504
Defendant:
Adams, R. Bannister, James G. Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony K. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Charles Walker v. Andrew J. Stern, et al
as 12-3861
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES WALKER, AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF KIARA WALKER (DECEASED)
Defendant - Appellee:
ANDREW J. STERN, KLINE & SPECTER, ANGIE OTERO, a/k/a Angie Jones and others
Jones v. Boston Scientific, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02926
Plaintiff:
Angie Jones
Defendant:
Boston Scientific, Inc. and John Doe Corporations 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
