Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Boyd v. Saul
as 4:2021cv04460
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Leslye Ann Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Boyd v. Ehlers et al
as 6:2021cv02016
Defendant:
Crystal Lynse, Jordan Ehlers and Michael Girsch
Plaintiff:
Theresa Ann Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eddie Dean Dogan, Jr. v. Tony A. Fisher, et. al.
as 7:2018cv03129
Plaintiff:
Eddie Dean Dogan and Eddie Dean Dogan, Jr.
Defendant:
State of South Carolina, County of Spartanburg, Ed Membeno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCDOW et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2018cv01049
Plaintiff:
LAVORIS ANN BOYD and THOMAS MCDOW
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Boyd v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00233
Defendant:
Atrium Medical Corporation, Getinge AB and Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC
Plaintiff:
Teenie Ann Boyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kimberly Anne Boyd v. Nancy A. Berryhill
as 2:2017cv03681
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Anne Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Dominick v. LeBlanc et al
as 1:2017cv00097
Plaintiff:
Gerard Dominick
Defendant:
Jimmy LeBlanc, Keith Deville and Anne Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brumfield v. LeBlanc et al
as 1:2017cv00103
Defendant:
Jimmy LeBlanc, Keith Deville and Anne Boyd
Plaintiff:
Charles Brumfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. LeBlanc et al
as 1:2017cv00098
Defendant:
Jimmy LeBlanc, Keith Deville and Anne Boyd
Plaintiff:
Bradley Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chisholm v. LeBlanc et al
as 1:2017cv00101
Defendant:
Jimmy LeBlanc, Keith Deville, Anne Boyd and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Chisholm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
