Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Clayton v. Angol
as 3:2024cv00026
Petitioner:
Terry Anthony Clayton
Respondent:
Sara Angol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clayton v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00161
Petitioner:
Michael Anthony Clayton
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Clayton v. GEO Group Private Contractor et al
as 3:2022cv50364
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Clayton
Defendant:
GEO Group Private Contractor, Officer Gardner, Secretary Vendella and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kavanaugh v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) et al
as 1:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Anthony Clayton Kavanaugh and Anthony Kavanaugh
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ), Darren Wallace, Roshanda Pollard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clayton v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00046
Petitioner:
Michael Anthony Clayton
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Kavanaugh v. Lumpkin
as 4:2021cv02245
Petitioner:
Anthony Clayton Kavanaugh
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kavanaugh v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2021cv00056
Petitioner:
Anthony Clayton Kavanaugh
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ternaprovich et al v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv01258
Plaintiff:
James Ternaprovich, Mario Reyes, Ronald T Franz and others
Defendant:
Louis Shicker, Illinois Department of Corrections, Wexford Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bogany v. University of Texas Medical Branch
as 4:2018cv00638
Defendant:
University of Texas Medical Branch
Plaintiff:
Anthony Clayton Bogany
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clayton v. Clarke, etc.
as 2:2011cv00372
Petitioner:
Joseph Anthony Clayton
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
