Cases 1 - 10 of 12
McIntosh v. Walmart Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv03103
Plaintiff:
Anthony McIntosh
Defendant:
Walmart Inc. d/b/a Walmart Lexington Supercenter, American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania and Walmart Inc. doing business as Walmart Lexington Supercenter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
McIntosh v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2023cv00705
Petitioner:
Michael Anthony McIntosh
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons and Warden Baraza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
US v. Michael McIntosh
as 21-6500
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY MCINTOSH, a/k/a Lo, a/k/a Polo
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
McIntosh v. Commissioner of Social Securit
as 21-635
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony McIntosh
Defendant / Appellee:
Commissioner of Social Security
McIntosh v. Adams
as 3:2020cv00010
Respondent:
Warden Paul Adams
Petitioner:
Michael Anthony McIntosh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McIntosh v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2019cv05362
Plaintiff:
Anthony McIntosh
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
McIntosh et al v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv13176
Plaintiff:
Cynthia McIntosh and Anthony McIntosh
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Sanofi US Services Inc. f/k/a Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc. and Sanofi US Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Danley v. Office Depot, Inc. et al
as 9:2014cv81469
Plaintiff:
Brian Danley and Anthony McIntosh
Defendant:
Office Depot, Inc. and Officemax North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
US v. Anthony McIntosh
as 13-4460
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTHONY MCINTOSH
MCINTOSH v. THE PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM ON STATE ROAD
as 2:2012cv00423
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ANTHONY MCINTOSH
Defendant:
THE PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM ON STATE ROAD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
