Cases 1 - 10 of 13
NASH v. LITTLE et al
as 3:2022cv00079
Petitioner:
ANGEL ANTHONY NASH
Respondent:
GEORGE LITTLE, SUPERINTENDANT KLINEFELTER, C. WALSTROM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Securities and Exchange Commission v. McLane et al
as 2:2020cv00122
Defendant:
John Brian McLane, Jr. and Paul Anthony Nash
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
NASH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv70160
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY NASH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The Estate of Christopher Nash, et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2020cv05012
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF CHRISTOPHER NASH, by and through his successor-in-interest ANTHONY NASH an indvidual, ANTHONY NASH, an individual, Anthony Nash and others
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES and DOES 1-50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NASH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv70851
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DRAKE ANTHONY NASH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Michael Nash
as 19-5416
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL ANTHONY NASH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nash v. Hefel et al
as 1:2018cv06289
Defendant:
Acletta Kubik, Alfred Caruse, Michael Laurie and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Nash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nash v. Prince George's Police Dept. et al
as 8:2018cv02379
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Nash
Defendant:
Kimberly B. Righter, Cpl. Kelly Rogers #1851, Police Officer Visbal #3755 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Nash v. Laurie et al
as 1:2017cv01934
Plaintiff:
Anthony Nash
Defendant:
Michael Laurie and Steven Hefel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nash v. Korte
as 1:2017cv00869
Petitioner:
Anthony Nash
Respondent:
Jeff Korte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
