Cases 1 - 10 of 302
EVANS v. THROCKMORTON et al
as 1:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SCOTT EVANS
Defendant:
LARRY MICHAEL THROCKMORTON and H&M LOGGING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Stout v. Lovett
as 3:2024cv00042
Petitioner:
Anthony Scott Stout
Respondent:
S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Scott v. Joseph
as 2:2024cv00735
Petitioner:
Anthony Scott
Respondent:
K. Joseph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Duke v. McIntosh County, et al. et al
as 6:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Anthony Scott Duke
Defendant:
McIntosh County, et al., McIntosh County Jail and McIntosh County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Lusk, et al
as 5:2024cv00018
Defendant:
Anthony Scott White, Michael Lusk, Bart Craytor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glenn v. Velociti, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Anthony Scott Glenn
Defendant:
Velociti, Inc. and Deryk L. Powell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
White v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00002
Petitioner:
Anthony Scott White
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2024cv00007
Petitioner:
Anthony Scott White
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Unknown et al
as 6:2023cv00612
Plaintiff:
Anthony Scott White
Defendant:
Warden Unknown Unknown and Captain Unknown Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Unknown et al
as 5:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
Anthony Scott White
Defendant:
Warden Unknown Unknown and Captain Unknown Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
