Cases
MATOS v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC
as 2:2023cv05038
Plaintiff: ANTONIO MATOS
Defendant: UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RASIER, LLC, RASIER-PA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
MATOS v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv01201
Plaintiff: ANTONIO MATOS
Defendant: UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RASIER-PA, LLC, RASIER, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
USA v. Jhon Ante-Panameno
as 19-20409
Defendant / Appellant: JHON ANTE-PANAMENO, also known as Jhon Edwin Ante Panameno, also known as Antonio Matos Marquez
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Kirby v. Matos
as 5:2018cv01112
Plaintiff: Steven W. Kirby
Defendant: Antonio Matos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Finance of America Reverse, LLC v. Matos-Lucerna et al
as 3:2016cv01569
Plaintiff: Finance of America Reverse, LLC
Defendant: Jose Antonio Matos-Lucerna, Irma Fuentes-Rodriguez, Conjugal Partnership Matos-Fuentes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Urban Financial Of America, LLC. v. Matos-Ortiz et al
as 3:2015cv02926
Plaintiff: Urban Financial of America, LLC.
Defendant: Julio Antonio Matos-Ortiz, Fidelina Arroyo, Conjugal Partnership Matos-Arroyo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company II v. Matos-Gorra et al
as 3:2015cv02890
Plaintiff: Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company II
Defendant: Jose Antonio Matos-Gorra and Rosa Alicia Garcia-Berges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Johnson v. New York City Department of He
as 10-4076
Plaintiff: Fred Jenkins, AKA Ronald Jenkins, Elfrain Santiago, Michael Walker and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: Herman Johnson
Defendant - Appellee: New York City Department of Health, Prison Health Services, John Doe #1, Nurse and others
US v. Matos We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-1459
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant: JORGE ANTONIO MATOS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?