Cases 11 - 20 of 97
Chounard v. Aramark Services, Inc
as 0:2022cv02044
Plaintiff:
Krista Chounard
Defendant:
Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC and Aramark Services, Inc
Aramark Food and Support Services Group, Inc. v. Agri Stats, Inc. et al
as 0:2022cv01843
Plaintiff:
ARAMARK Food and Support Services Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Agri Stats, Inc., Clemens Food Group, LLC, The Clemens Family Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Cake Love Co. v. AmeriPride Services, LLC et al
as 0:2022cv01301
Plaintiff:
Cake Love Co.
Defendant:
AmeriPride Services, LLC, Aramark Uniform Services, Inc. and Aramark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity: Forcible Detainer
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv00832
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Taylor v. Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC
as 4:2021cv04092
Plaintiff:
Corey Taylor
Defendant:
Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Larsen v. Menard, Inc. et al
as 0:2021cv02324
Plaintiff:
Roberta Larsen
Defendant:
Menard, Inc. and ARAMARK Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hughes-Weston v. EPSV Investments, LLC et al
as 5:2021cv06115
Plaintiff:
Deanna Hughes-Weston
Defendant:
EPSV Investments, LLC, BBQ Holdings, Inc and Aramark Uniform Services (Midwest) LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00805
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv00607
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Lawrence v. Aramark et al
as 4:2020cv01363
Defendant:
Does, Musaddiq, Aramark and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Lawrence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
