Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv06796
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rivera v. Blanche
as 26-3191
Respondent:
TODD BLANCHE, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
BRENDA VERENIEE ARANA-RIVERA, ANGEL GABRIEL ARANA-RIVERA and CLAUDIA LISSETTE RIVERA
Sonderling v. Arana's Agriculture LLC et al
as 2:2026cv07918
Plaintiff:
Keith Sonderling
Defendant:
Arana's Agriculture LLC, Arana's Agribusiness LLC, Elia Duarte and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1801 Farmworker Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv14609
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01457
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Unknown:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Collier v. Garcia et al
as 1:2026cv02742
Plaintiff:
Tidis Collier
Defendant:
Barbara L. Garcia, Jose E. Garza, Victor Arturo Arana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03744
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Arana Cabrera v. Blanche
as 26-6195
Petitioner:
VIDAL ARANA CABRERA
Respondent:
TODD BLANCHE, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Arana v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv02609
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Arana
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv07705
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
