Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Stiles v. Ariens Company
as 2:2023cv02586
Plaintiff:
Eunice Faye Stiles
Defendant:
Ariens Company
Not Classified By Court:
Ed Pulliam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Scott et al v. Ariens Company et al
as 2:2023cv02169
Plaintiff:
Victoria Scott and J. B. Scott
Defendant:
Ariens Company, Home Depot USA Inc and Unidentified Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wolt et al v. Embankscape Equipment, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv02503
Plaintiff:
Leon Wolt and Debra Wolt
Defendant:
Embankscape Equipment, LLC, Kar-Tech, Inc., Kar-Tech Global, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jerome v. Ariens Company et al
as 2:2021cv01292
Plaintiff:
Joseph Jerome
Defendant:
Ariens Company and Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schwager, et al v. Ariens Company
as 2:2019cv01025
Defendant:
Ariens Company
Plaintiff:
Mick Schwager, Tricia Schwager and individually and as parents and next friends of Q.S.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
John v. Ariens Company et al
as 2:2019cv01378
Defendant:
Kohler Company, Husqvarna Professional Products Inc., Ariens Company and others
Plaintiff:
Priya John
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LeJeune et al v. Ariens Company
as 2:2019cv11388
Plaintiff:
Lacy Lejeune, Jayla Lejeune and Jason Lejeune
Defendant:
Ariens Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01704
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Metalcraft of Mayville Inc v. Ariens Company
as 2:2016cv00903
Plaintiff:
Metalcraft of Mayville Inc
Defendant:
Ariens Company
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
DIERS v. ARIENS COMPANY et al
as 3:2016cv01044
Plaintiff:
KARL DIERS
Defendant:
ARIENS COMPANY , HOME DEPOT INC. and ABC CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
