Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Brown v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2019cv01501
Plaintiff:
Arlene Brown
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Arlene Brown v. Lion Share Investments, LLC, et al
as 17-17203
:
In the Matter of: ARLENE BROWN
Appellant:
ARLENE BROWN
Appellee:
LION SHARE INVESTMENTS, LLC and DAVID BURCHARD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv05531
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Brown v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv03401
Plaintiff:
Arlene Brown
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. Ford Motor Company, et al.
as 1:2016cv01203
Plaintiff:
Brown and Arlene Brown
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and V & V Motors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Walker et al v. Cunningham et al
as 2:2012cv00152
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Walker , David Richardson , Wallace Shaw and others
Defendant:
Vanessa L. Cunningham , Mildred S. Hopkins , Patricia A. Johnson and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Margarite Blakley , Mary Hamilton , Arlene Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-1758
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Goldbourne, et al v. Johnson, et al
as 08-60773
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SPENCER BROWN, ARLENE BROWN, FLORENCE CLARKE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CURTIZE D JOHNSON and GREY HOUND BUS CO, doing business as Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
