Cases 41 - 50 of 64
Arthur Jones, Jr. v. J. Caraway
as 13-3754
Petitioner - Appellant:
ARTHUR JONES, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
J. F. CARAWAY
JONES v. CARAWAY
as 2:2013cv00322
Respondent:
J.F. CARAWAY
Petitioner:
ARTHUR JONES, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Abood et al v. Plant Performance Services, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2013cv02964
Defendant:
O'Brien's Response Management L.L.C., Plant Performance Services, L.L.C. doing business as P2S, Fluor Enterprises, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas S Abood, Latasha Acoo, John H Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Personal Injury
PostNet International Franchise Corporation v. Jones et al
as 1:2012cv03065
Plaintiff:
PostNet International Franchise Corporation
Defendant:
Arthur Jones and Carolyn Jones
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Rieckhoff, Ronald v. Abrahamson, Shirley et al
as 3:2012cv00090
Plaintiff:
Ronald F. Rieckhoff
Defendant:
James E. Doyle , Guy D. Dutcher, Scott C. Blader and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ben v. Garden District Association et al
as 2:2012cv00174
Defendant:
Garden District Association, New Orleans Private Patrol Service, Inc and Arthur Jones, III
Plaintiff:
James Ben
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv05596
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jones v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 8:2011cv00529
Plaintiff:
Arthur Jones
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Jones v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv00003
Plaintiff:
Arthur Jones
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Broussard et al v Gulfstream Coach Inc et al
as 2:2010cv02510
Plaintiff:
Gloria Broussard , Gloria Davis , Markela McCain and others
Defendant:
Gulfstream Coach, Inc. and Fluor Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
