Cases 1 - 10 of 14
GEORGES v. GALDHI et al
as 2:2023cv05168
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY GEORGES
Defendant:
BALAZS GALDHI, JOSEPHINE P. FRIMPONG, NOELLE ZUENA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
ASHLEY GEORGES v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2022cv05559
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY GEORGES
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LESLIE RUSSELL, OFFICER FRONDUTO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GEORGES v. CLINICIAN LEFF et al
as 2:2022cv02939
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY GEORGES
Defendant:
CLINICIAN LEFF and DIRECTOR OF MENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT KALAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Forbes v. George
as 1:2021cv06317
Plaintiff:
Gilbert J Forbes
Defendant:
Ashley George
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
GEORGES v. CECCHI
as 1:2021cv13149
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY GEORGES
Defendant:
CLAIRE C. CECCHI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashley Georges v. Administrator New Jersey State, et al
as 21-1954
Defendant / Appellee:
ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ASHLEY GEORGES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00361
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
GEORGES v. GABRIEL et al
as 2:2020cv05803
Defendant:
CINDY SWEENEY, AHAB GABRIEL, BARRINGTON LYNCH and others
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY GEORGES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronnie Dyson v. Brian Liggan
as 12-1101
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RONNIE DYSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN LIGGAN, Virginia Capital Realty Property Manager of 1514 Perry Street, Richmond, VA 23224, DAVID LIGGAN, Virginia Capital Realty Property Manager of 1514 Perry Street, Richmond, VA 23224, VIRGINIA CAPITAL REALTY, Fannie Mae (Owner) and others
DYSON v. LIGGAN, et al
as 3:2011cv00519
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Dyson
Defendant:
Brian Liggan, David Liggan, Virginia capital realty and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
