Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Minnesota Chapter of Associated Builders and Contractors, Inc. et al v. Ellison et al
as 0:2024cv00536
Plaintiff: Minnesota Chapter of Associated Builders and Contractors, Inc., National Federation of Independent Business, Inc. and Laketown Electric Corporation
Defendant: Keith Ellison and Nicole Blissenbach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Earle Asphalt Co, et al v. County of Atlantic, et al
as 22-3166
Plaintiff / Appellant: EARLE ASPHALT CO, LUIS SILVERIO and ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS INC NEW JERSEY CHAPTER
Defendant: COUNTY OF ATLANTIC
Defendant / Appellee: SOUTH JERSEY BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL AFL CIO
Earle Asphaly Co, et al v. County of Camden, et al
as 22-2648
Plaintiff / Appellant: EARLE ASPHALY CO, LUIS SILVERIO and ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS INC NEW JERSEY CHAPTER
Defendant / Appellee: COUNTY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY and UNITED BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL OF SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY AFL CIO
Metropolitan Washington Chapter, Associated Build, et al v. DC, et al
as 22-7014
Plaintiff / Appellant: Metropolitan Washington Chapter, Associated Builders and Contractors, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellee: Miller & Long Concrete Construction, Inc. and Emmett Morris, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee: District of Columbia, a municipal corporation and Muriel Bowser, In her official capacity as Mayor of the District of Columbia
State of Georgia, et al v. President of the United States, et al
as 21-14269
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF IDAHO and others
Defendant / Appellant: PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, SAFER FEDERAL WORKFORCE TASK FORCE, UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT and others
Amicus Curiae: AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ALLERGY, ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS and others
Not Classified By Court: SERVICE and AMERICAN PSYCHIATRICS INSTITUTE
Assoc Builders and Contractors, et al v. OSHA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-4083
Not Classified By Court: In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner: ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS, INC. and ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS OF ALABAMA, INC.
Respondent: OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Associated Builders and Contractors, Inc., et al v. Occupational Safety and Health Administration, et al
as 21-13910
Petitioner: ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS, INC. and ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS OF ALABAMA, INC.
Respondent: OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
The State of Georgia et al v. Biden et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00163
Plaintiff: The State of Georgia, The State of Alabama, The State of Idaho and others
Defendant: Joseph R. Biden, Safer Federal Workforce Task Force, United States Office of Personnel Management and others
Not Yet Classified: Associated Builders and Contractors of Georgia, Inc.
Amicus Curiae: American Medical Association
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Coalition for Workforce Innovation et al v. Walsh et al
as 1:2021cv00130
Plaintiff: Associated Builders and Contractors of Southeast Texas, Coalition for Workforce Innovation, Associated Builders and Contractors, Inc. and others
Defendant: United States Department of Labor, Secretary Marty Walsh, Principal Deputy Adm Jessica Looman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Associated Builders and Contractors, Inc., Minnesota/North Dakota Chapter et al v. Minneapolis Public Schools Special School District No. 1 et al
as 0:2019cv00656
Plaintiff: Associated Builders and Contractors, Inc., Minnesota/North Dakota Chapter and Laketown Electric Corporation
Defendant: Minneapolis Public Schools Special School District No. 1 and Nelson Inz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?