Cases
USA v. Six AR-15 Style Rifles Without Serial Numbers et al
as 3:2023cv00857
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: Six AR-15 Style Rifles, One Remington 12 Gauge Shot Gun, Two 9MM Semiautomatic Handguns and others
Claimant: Gregory Leary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. Diamondback Arms Rifle et al
as 1:2022cv01224
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Diamondback Arms Rifle, Bersa Firestorm Pistol, Garaysar Shotgun and others
Claimant: Tony Davis
USA v. ONE GLOCK GMBH 22 PISTOL, .40 CALIBER, SERIAL NUMBER: BCKV842; et al
as 4:2019mc00591
Defendant: FIFTY-NINE ROUNDS .40 CALIBER AMMUNITION;, ONE GLOCK GMBH 22 PISTOL, .40 CALIBER, SERIAL NUMBER: BCKV842; and THREE ASSORTED MAGAZINES;
Plaintiff: USA
United States of America v. Intratec et al
as 3:2014cv01594
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Intratec, Norinco, Eagle Arms and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. A HiPoint .380 Caliber et al
as 3:2014cv00891
Defendant: A HiPoint .380 Caliber, A HiPoint .380 caliber, A HiPoint 9mm pistol and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
United States Of America v. One Romarm/Cugir WASR-10 Rifle, Serial Number 1-62803-03, et al
as 2:2012cv00087
Respondent: 10 Assorted Magazines, 101 Rounds of Assorted Ammunition, One Rifle Bayonet and others
Petitioner: United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. A Remington .22 Caliber et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2011cv00256
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: Diaz-Rosas Personal Property, Specifically Described as a Remington .22 Caliber, Model 5501 Rifle with no serial number, A Savage 12 Gauge, A Colt .22 LR Caliber Handgun and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0924

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?