Cases 1 - 10 of 91
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Huggins v. Asurion Services, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Geohn Huggins
Defendant:
Asurion Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. Hutchinson et al
as 5:2023cv04774
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ROBINSON
Defendant:
Kevin Hutchinson individually and doing business as UBREAKIFIX BY ASURION, OFFICER RYAN M. WIEGAND and East Lampeter Township Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smith v. Asurion, LLC
as 4:2023cv02256
Plaintiff:
Stephen Smith
Defendant:
Asurion, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00999
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Spann et al v. Carter et al
as 3:2023cv01028
Plaintiff:
William A. Spann and Marty Spann
Defendant:
Ed Carter, Mitchell Bailey, Dale Grandstaff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00422
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
MORNING v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv02483
Plaintiff:
SHANNON MORNING
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC., ALLSTATE, ASURION, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
