Cases 1 - 10 of 855
(PC) Howard v. Rios et al
as 1:2024cv00447
Plaintiff:
Karlis Ruben Augustus Howard
Defendant:
J. Rios, Steve Smith, City of Coalinga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welby Cox v. DOJ, et al
as 24-1606
Plaintiff:
WELBY THOMAS COX
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and ZACHARY AUGUSTUS MYERS, United States Attorney General
Rodriguez v. Cotton et al
as 4:2024cv00313
Plaintiff:
Carolina Rodriguez
Defendant:
Officer FNU Cotton and Corporal Augustus Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Howard v. Komaki, et al.
as 1:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
Karlis Ruben Augustus Howard
Defendant:
Emi Komaki, BD Young, C Caldua and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Howard v. Shirley et al
as 1:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Karlis Ruben Augustus Howard
Defendant:
Heather Shirley, James Cronjager and Scott Degough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byrd et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2024cv01742
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Byrd, Alan J. Kidd, Alan T. Haynes and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Augustus Evans, Jr.In re: Augustus Evans, Jr.
as 24-1475
Petitioner:
In re: AUGUSTUS HEBREW EVANS, JR.
Not Yet Classified:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Evans v. Emig et al
as 1:2024cv00322
Petitioner:
Augustus Hebrew Evans, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Brian Emig and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Howard v. Parks, et al.
as 1:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
Karlis Ruben Augustus Howard
Defendant:
Aylana Olivia Parks, J. Membreno, H. Salazar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Augustus v. City of Los Angeles, et al.
as 24-1367
Plaintiff:
KARL AUGUSTUS
Defendant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, MICHEL MOORE, Chief, ROBERT OLMOS, Sergeant and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
