Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Wagner v. USA
as 3:2026cv00046
Petitioner:
Auston Cole Wagner
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Collier v. City of Chicago
as 1:2026cv07116
Plaintiff:
Auston Collier
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
May v. Doe 1
as 3:2026cv00470
Plaintiff:
Auston May
Defendant:
John Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LaCava v. El Paso County Jail et al
as 1:2026cv01461
Plaintiff:
Auston J. LaCava and Auston James LaCava
Defendant:
El Paso County Jail, El Paso Sheriff's Office, Public Defenders Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Esteras et al
as 3:2026cv30012
Plaintiff:
Eulogio Rodriguez
Defendant:
Dennis Esteras, Ivette Esteras, Alejandro D. Esteras and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Wexford Health Sources et al
as 3:2026cv00010
Plaintiff:
Brint Auston Collins
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Nurse Karen and Health Admin Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horras v. Iowa Health Systems
as 4:2026cv00018
Plaintiff:
Auston Horras
Defendant:
Iowa Health Systems doing business as UnityPoint Health
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0216 (b) FLSA: Minimum wage or overtime compensation
Auterbridge v. Davis, et al.
as 3:2025cv02364
Plaintiff:
Charles Auterbridge, IV
Defendant:
Cedric Davis, Aramark Kirk, Aramark Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
McLain v. Whiteman et al
as 4:2025cv04188
Plaintiff:
Auston McLain
Defendant:
R Whiteman, . Damewood, . Abernacki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waldrop v. Basic American Inc
as 2:2025cv00382
Plaintiff:
Auston Waldrop
Defendant:
Basic American Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 fl Removal- Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
