Cases 1 - 10 of 222
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
General Motors LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv00887
Plaintiff:
General Motors LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Anni Car Modification Store, AUTO-ZONE Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Hill v. State Farm et al
as 1:2022cv00032
Plaintiff:
Anthony B. Hill
Defendant:
State Farm, TDCI, AT&T and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00655
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
James et al v. Auto Zone Inc
as 5:2021cv02707
Plaintiff:
Elmer James and Dale James
Defendant:
Auto Zone Inc and AutoZone Stores L L C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GRAY v. AUTO ZONE, a foreign profit corporation et al
as 2:2020cv12261
Defendant:
AUTO ZONE, a foreign profit corporation and NICHOLAS ISLES
Plaintiff:
NAYONN GRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Autozone IP LLC v. Singh
as 3:2020cv01472
Plaintiff:
Autozone IP LLC
Defendant:
Gurjit S. Gill, Gurjits Singh, Gurjit Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01886
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Chatman v. Auto Zone et al
as 3:2019cv00880
Plaintiff:
Eric Chatman
Defendant:
Auto Zone and Auto Zone Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
