Cases 61 - 70 of 392
Rudolf Construction Partners, LLC v. AutoZone, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00270
Plaintiff:
Rudolf Construction Partners, LLC
Defendant:
AutoZone, Inc., AutoZone Development, LLC, AutoZone Stores, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00750
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Jonas v. AutoZoners LLC et al
as 1:2022cv03672
Plaintiff:
Corry Jonas
Defendant:
AutoZoners LLC, AutoZone, Stores, Inc. and AutoZone, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022xc01537
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 Family and Medical Leave
Rochelle v. Autozoners, LLC et al
as 7:2021cv01220
Defendant:
George Verkamp, Darryl Delmas, ALLDATA LLC d/b/a ALLDATA AUTOMOTIVE INTELLIGENCE and others
Plaintiff:
David Rochelle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fm Fed. Question: Family and Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00783
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv11004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022at00481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Ministrap, LLC v. AutoZone, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00229
Plaintiff:
Ministrap, LLC
Defendant:
AutoZone, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
