Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04485
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 jr Judicial Review
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv24911
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Preston v. Grand Lodge of Free and Accepted Masons of The State of New York
as 1:2026cv04321
Plaintiff:
Ebony Marsha Preston
Defendant:
Grand Lodge of Free and Accepted Masons of The State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01702
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hicks v. Corley Trust LLC et al
as 1:2026cv01042
Plaintiff:
Rodney Tyree Hicks
Defendant:
Corley Trust LLC, Don Mason & Son, LLC, Jerry Langley Oil Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Mertens et al v. Lichtenfelt et al
as 2:2026cv12474
Defendant:
Alexandria Lichtenfelt, Welfare & Pension Administration Service, Inc., Alexandria Sexton and others
Plaintiff:
Rowen Mertens, Leah Mertens and Benjamin Mertens
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Garrett v. United States of America
as 2:2026cv04175
Plaintiff:
Mason Garrett
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Montes et al
as 3:2026cv07415
Plaintiff:
Joshua Mason
Defendant:
CO Montes, TTA Nurses and TTA On Call Doctor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MATT RHOADES, TRUSTEE AND INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS PENSION FUND, v. DIVERSE CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LLC
as 1:2026cv01495
Plaintiff:
MATT RHOADES, TRUSTEE AND INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS PENSION FUND,
Defendant:
DIVERSE CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
