Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.
as 21-16695
Plaintiff:
EPIC GAMES, INC.
Counter Claimant:
APPLE, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
TILE, MATCH GROUP, INC., BASECAMP and others
Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.
as 21-16506
Appellant:
EPIC GAMES, INC.
Counter Claimant:
APPLE, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
38 LAW, ECONOMICS, AND BUSINESS PROFESSORS, TILE, COMMITTEE TO SUPPORT THE ANTITRUST LAWS and others
Overton v. Johnson & Johnson Services Inc et al
as 3:2020cv02757
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Services Inc, DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, DOES 1-10, inclusive and others
Special Master:
Special Master
Plaintiff:
Michael B. Overton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Orr v. Dawson et al
as 5:2020cv00267
Plaintiff:
Roger H. Orr
Defendant:
A. Dawson, D. Kelso, B. Overton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Overton v. Social Security Adm. Office of Disability
as 1:2017cv09150
Plaintiff:
Dwayne B. Overton
Defendant:
Social Security Adm. Office of Disability
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gary Northington v. Jim Armstrong, et al
as 13-2449
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY M. NORTHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
JIM ARMSTRONG, Administrative Assistant, WENDY BALL, RN, COLLEEN BROWN, RUM and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv00947
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Northington #193035 v. Armstrong et al
as 1:2010cv00424
Plaintiff:
Gary M. Northington #193035
Defendant:
Jim Armstrong, Wendy Ball, Kamania Kaza Barclay #213321 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boustred et al v. Government and County of Santa Cruz et.al.
as 5:2008cv00546
Plaintiff:
Clive Frank Boustred, RCB, WFB and others
Defendant:
Government and County of Santa Cruz, Government and State of California, Government of the United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
