Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Jordan v. Smith et al
as 1:2026cv00458
Plaintiff:
Jerome Jordan
Defendant:
FNU Smith, FNU Strong, FNU Goodall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03045
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Dossey v. Griffis
as 26-50776
Plaintiff:
Christopher Royce Dossey
Defendant:
Sheriff Mike Griffis, FNU McKinney, FNU Cox, Lieutenant and others
Wilkinson v. City of Jacksonville Illinois et al
as 3:2026cv03235
Plaintiff:
Amanda Raye Wilkinson
Defendant:
City of Jacksonville Illinois, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2026cv04813
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Raye Smith
Defendant:
Becton Dickinson and Company, C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Access Systems Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Butler v. Grupo Lozano Transportes LLC et al
as 4:2026cv05105
Plaintiff:
Shelbie Raye Butler
Defendant:
Grupo Lozano Transportes LLC and Jose Rene Luna Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
United States v. McCombs
as 26-5076
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SONNY RAYE MCCOMBS
Batemon v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2026cv01193
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Raye Batemon
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dossey v. Griffis
as 26-50357
Plaintiff:
Christopher Royce Dossey
Defendant:
Sheriff Mike Griffis, McKinney, Lieutenant Cox and others
Ebony Lucas v. McDowell Quail, LLC
as 26-1561
Plaintiff:
EBONY SHERISSE LUCAS
Defendant:
MCDOWELL QUAIL, LLC, DWELL AT CARMEL APPARTMENTS, PEGASUS RESIDENTIAL, LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
