Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Carr v. Oklahoma, State of et al
as 6:2026cv00251
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Lee Carr
Defendant:
Oklahoma, State of, Department of Corrections, Garrison Greg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02850
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Neill v. United States, et al
as 26-3147
Plaintiff:
CHASE NEILL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STEPHEN HUNTING, Assistant U.S. Attorney, in his individual capacity, JILL MORRISON, U.S. Magistrate Judge, in her individual capacity and others
Curry v. Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc. et al
as 8:2026cv02138
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA CURRY
Defendant:
Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc. and Harris Teeter, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Morgan v. Harris Teeter, LLC
as 8:2026cv02117
Plaintiff:
PAMMY MORGAN
Defendant:
Harris Teeter, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Neill v. United States of America et al
as 5:2026cv03136
Plaintiff:
Chase Neill
Defendant:
United States of America, Stephen Hunting, Jill Morrison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bennett v. Harris Teeter, LLC
as 8:2026cv01973
Plaintiff:
Sharon Bennett
Defendant:
Harris Teeter, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Motor Vehicle
Cady v. Wilson et al
as 2:2026cv01576
Plaintiff:
Thomas Oscar Cady
Defendant:
Katie Wilson, Carmondy, Weaver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crayton v. Teeter et al
as 6:2026cv01104
Plaintiff:
Larry Darnell Crayton
Defendant:
Holly L. Teeter and Gwynne E. Birzer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Teeter v. Nectar Sleep LLC
as 2:2026cv01380
Plaintiff:
Shawn Teeter
Defendant:
Nectar Sleep LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
