Cases 1 - 10 of 25
James v. Strength of Nature LLC. et al
as 1:2023cv09555
Plaintiff:
Barbara James
Defendant:
Strength of Nature LLC., Revlon Inc, LOreal USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JAMES v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2021cv03235
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
BARBARA JAMES
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wales v. James
as 3:2019cv00091
Petitioner:
Leo Wales
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Respondent:
Barbara James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Breeden v. ACT Dental Practice Coaching Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv05841
Defendant:
ACT Dental Practice Coaching Corporation, Kirk Behrendt and Barbara James
Plaintiff:
John Breeden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pinkton v. Jenkins et al
as 3:2017cv00202
Plaintiff:
Adam Lee Pinkton
Defendant:
Lepher Jenkins, Barbara James and Marshall County Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James, et al v. Underwriters at Lloyd's London, et al.
as 2:2017cv00809
Plaintiff:
Barbara James and William E. James, III
Defendant:
Stephen W. Gilbert and Underwriters at Lloyd's London
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PARKER v. DAVIS et al
as 5:2015cv00271
Plaintiff:
LEE MCDANIEL PARKER
Defendant:
DAVID DAVIS, STREET, FAIR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00491
Plaintiff:
Barbara James
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00483
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
