Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Lester v. Yawn et al
as 5:2023ct03348
Plaintiff:
Andre Eugene Lester
Defendant:
Colleen Yawn, Tana Dillard-Hill, William M. Mouring and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sinclair v. Rivera et al
as 5:2023ct03180
Plaintiff:
James T. Sinclair
Defendant:
Officer Rivera, Officer Brothers, Officer Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yount v. Riddick et al
as 5:2021ct03350
Plaintiff:
John Yount
Defendant:
Officer Riddick, Sergeant Barfield and Sergeant Melatta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Brien et al v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company et al
as 5:2020cv00208
Plaintiff:
Leonard Pryor, Candi Ellis, Thomas Keister and others
Defendant:
E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, THE CHEMOURS COMPANY, THE CHEMOURS COMPANY FC, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barfield v. Smith et al
as 5:2019ct03193
Defendant:
Administrator Warren, Sheriff Lemme Smith and Medical Providor
Plaintiff:
George A. Barfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HINES et al v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2019cv00515
Plaintiff:
Aris Hines and Brandi Thomason
Defendant:
Sheriff TERRY S. JOHNSON, Deputy Sheriff Randy Jones, Doe Deputies 1-10 and others
Petitioner:
MAGISTRATE S.B. BARFIELD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kimble v. Parks et al
as 5:2018ct03133
Plaintiff:
William Kimble
Defendant:
Ms. Parks, Lt. Turley, Sgt. Barfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barfield v. NC Parole Commission
as 5:2017ct03190
Plaintiff:
Joe D. Barfield
Defendant:
NC Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barfield v. Berryhill
as 5:2017cv00314
Plaintiff:
Brigette D. Barfield
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Barfield Montoya v. Berryhill
as 5:2017cv00094
Plaintiff:
Carol Barfield Montoya
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
