Cases 1 - 10 of 1,904
Alexander v. Correctional Managed Health Care et al
as 4:2024cv01709
Plaintiff:
Darrold Alexander
Defendant:
Correctional Managed Health Care, Dr. Lannette Linthicum, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrow v. Hydrick et al
as 1:2024cv01975
Plaintiff:
John Barrow
Defendant:
Stacey Hydrick, James Balli and Warren Selby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00598
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Dwight Bowen v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-1714
Plaintiff:
DWIGHT BOWEN
Defendant:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DORINA VARNER, KERI MOORE and others
Carr et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00460
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Carr, Jazemine Adams, Brandon D Alexander-Pryor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
BARROW v. ATTORNEY GENERAL
as 3:2024cv00107
Petitioner:
MARK BARROW
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barrow (PS) v. Williams
as 1:2024cv00613
Petitioner:
Donnell Barrow
Respondent:
J.F. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
BARROW v. USA
as 1:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
KHASIM BARROW
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Barrow v. Gurvinder et al
as 2:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Shirley Marie Barrow
Defendant:
Singh Gurvinder and G Trucking Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Flakes v. Reed et al
as 2:2024cv10475
Plaintiff:
Jason Flakes
Defendant:
Reed, D. Horvath, J Bugbee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
