Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv00579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX of the Education Amendment of 1972
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 (a)(d) - Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
Laurel Pointe Owner, LLC v. Belton
as 1:2026cv04531
Plaintiff:
Laurel Pointe Owner, LLC doing business as Redwood Ridge
Defendant:
Shaquana Belton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Madunezim v. Quinn et al
as 1:2026cv02291
Plaintiff:
Brian Madunezim
Defendant:
Joseph Quinn, John Doe #4, CO Damiano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Belton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2026cv00584
Plaintiff:
Ebony Jamil Belton
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Garrett v. Cooke
as 6:2026cv00390
Petitioner:
Larry Dewayne Garrett
Respondent:
Bill Cooke, Lt Leslie, Sgt Galispy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marcus Belton v. Warden Birkholz
as 2:2026cv06045
Petitioner:
Marcus Belton
Respondent:
Warden Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Marcus Belton v. Warden Birkholz
as 2:2026cv06035
Petitioner:
Marcus Belton
Respondent:
Warden Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
BELTON v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2026cv03756
Plaintiff:
MARY BELTON
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC and PHARMACIA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Belton v. Pinkney
as 1:2026cv01823
Plaintiff:
Tony Belton
Defendant:
Sgt. Pinkney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
