Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Benjamin Johnson v. Brian Sterling
as 22-6332
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
BRYAN P. STIRLING and APRIL CLARKE
Johnson v. Sterling et al
as 2:2020cv03831
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Johnson
Defendant:
Bryan P Sterling and April Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James McNeill v. Marquhne Johnson
as 19-7270
Defendant / Appellee:
ALFRED WILLIAMS, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, KEVIN WHITE, Correctional Lieutenant, SUSAN MORRISON, Correctional Officer and others
Defendant:
JHON HERRING, Correctional Superintendent and WILLIAM HORNE, Correctional Housing Unit Manager
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES C. MCNEILL
Johnson v. Sterling et al
as 2:2019cv00115
Defendant:
Rudy Tisdale, Michael McCall, Ms Cappadonia and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Johnson v. MBA Consulting Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00840
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Johnson
Defendant:
MBA Consulting Services, Inc. and Louis Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv27617
Plaintiff:
Janice Johnson and Benjamin Johnson
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Johnson et al
as 3:2011cv00001
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott Jones
Defendant:
Benjamin Johnson and Fredericksburg Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Benjamin Johnson v. Gene Johnson
as 09-7749
Petitioner - Appellant:
BENJAMIN JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Benjamin Johnson v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 09-1799
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BENJAMIN JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Johnson v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 2:2009cv00186
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Johnson
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question-Violation of Constitutional Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
