Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Calhoun et al v. Kane et al
as 2:2024cv10184
Plaintiff:
Terance Calhoun, Legal Conservator Octavia Monrie, Theodore Goodman and others
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Robert Kane, Jose Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bilal Muhammad v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2023cv09846
Plaintiff:
Bilal Muhammad
Defendant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES and DOES 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Muhammad v. Wiles
as 23-50786
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bilal Muhammad
Defendant / Appellee:
Richard Wiles, El Paso County Sheriff, Marco Vargas, Kevin Lanahan and others
Bilal Muhammad v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv01936
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Bilal Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Abdus-Salaam v. USA
as 1:2021cv00988
Defendant:
Bilal Muhammad Abuds-Salaam and USA
Petitioner:
Bilal Muhammad Abdus-Salaam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bilal Muhammad v. Richard Wiles, et al
as 20-50279
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID STOUT, RICARDO SAMANIEGO, EL PASO COUNTY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BILAL MUHAMMAD
Muhammad v. Wiles et al
as 3:2019cv00367
Defendant:
John Doe 1-125, Joanne Bernal, Aramark Services Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Bilal Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Wiles et al
as 3:2019cv00286
Defendant:
Mr. Richard Wiles, Any Other Violater(s) of the Constitution and Laws of the United States and The State of Texas and The Municipality of El Paso County, Texas
Plaintiff:
Bilal Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bilal Muhammad v. Richard Wiles
as 19-50514
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD WILES, El Paso County Sheriff
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BILAL MUHAMMAD
MUHAMMAD v. Wiles
as 3:2019cv00051
Defendant:
Richard Wiles
Plaintiff:
BILAL MUHAMMAD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
