Cases 1 - 10 of 715
McGhee v. Meaux et al
as 5:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Xavier McGhee
Defendant:
Chief Investigator Danny Meaux, Judge Robert Arnold, Attorney At Law Gus Sermos and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blackwell v. Stiltner et al
as 7:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Matthew Don Blackwell
Defendant:
T. Joseph Stiltner, Jack S. Hurley, Jr. and Unknown Court Evaluator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norman Blackwell v. Heather Ray
as 24-6337
Petitioner:
NORMAN BLACKWELL
Respondent:
HEATHER L. RAY, Warden
Blackwell v. Watson
as 3:2024cv00581
Petitioner:
Ryan D Blackwell
Respondent:
Richard Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blackwell v. Southwest Virginia Regional Jail Authority
as 7:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Matthew Don Blackwell
Defendant:
Southwest Virginia Regional Jail Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blackwell v. Neau
as 3:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Martin L. Blackwell
Defendant:
Dr. Yvonne Neau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLACKWELL v. USA
as 1:2024cv00097
Petitioner:
DAMON JERMAINE BLACKWELL, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Blackwell v. Watson
as 3:2024cv00264
Petitioner:
Ryan Demond Blackwell and Goo Zuhayr El
Defendant:
Richard Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blackwell v. Ellis County Sheriff et al
as 3:2024cv00235
Petitioner:
Byron Blackwell
Respondent:
Ellis County Sheriff, Ellis County Sheriff's Office, Ellis County Jailers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walter Beasley v. T. Peyton
as 24-6047
Plaintiff:
MR. WALTER RAY BEASLEY
Defendant:
MRS. T. PEYTON, Kitchen Supervisor, MR. LARRY LEABOUGH, Head Superintendent, MR. MARK CULVER, Lieutenant and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
