Cases 21 - 30 of 276
Carjuan Adkins v. Richard Watson, et al
as 22-1532
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARJUAN D. ADKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD WATSON, DELANCEY MOORE, III, JANELLE BLOODWORTH and others
Tammons v. St. Clair County Jail
as 3:2022cv00244
Plaintiff:
Norman Lee Tammons
Defendant:
St. Clair County Jail, Cathy MacElroy, Janelle Bloodworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRAIG v. DENNIS et al
as 5:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
KAREN GEORGETTE CRAIG
Defendant:
SARAH DENNIS, JONES COUNTY CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES, JANA WADELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CAMP ANDERSON INC v. BLOODWORTH et al
as 1:2022cv00005
Counter Defendant:
CAMP ANDERSON INC
Counter Claimant:
WILLIAM BLOODWORTH and CAMP ANDERSON MINISTRIES INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Oliver v. Bloodworth
as 3:2021cv01734
Petitioner:
King Michael Oliver
Respondent:
Ralph R. Bloodworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. Timothy Bloodworth
as 21-2702
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TIMOTHY BLOODWORTH
Bloodworth, II v. Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners et al
as 4:2021cv00488
Plaintiff:
Allen T. Bloodworth, II
Defendant:
Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners, Mayor Quinton Lucas, Don Wagner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLOODWORTH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv29151
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BOBBY BLOODWORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bloodworth #22221-040 v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv00497
Petitioner:
Quincy Tremayne Bloodworth
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BLOODWORTH v. MERCK & CO.,INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02307
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO.,INC.
Plaintiff:
RANDALL L. BLOODWORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
