Cases 1 - 10 of 2,298
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Campbell v. BNSF Railway Company
as 2:2024cv00608
Plaintiff:
Taylor A Campbell
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
CMA CGM, S.A. v. BNSF Railway Company
as 2:2024cv03369
Plaintiff:
CMA CGM, S.A.
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
BNSF Railway v. Federal Railroad Administration, et al.
as 05/1:24-CA-60173
Plaintiff:
BNSF Railway
Defendant:
Federal Railroad Administration
Galindo v. BNSF Railway Company et al
as 4:2024cv03070
Plaintiff:
Jason Galindo
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company, Archer Daniels Midland Company, ADM Transportation Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Buck, Randy v. BNSF Railway Company
as 3:2024cv00232
Plaintiff:
Randy Buck
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
BNSF Railway v. FRA
as 24-60173
Petitioner:
BNSF Railway Company
Respondent:
Federal Railroad Administration, Amit Bose, in his official capacity as Administrator, Federal Railroad Administration and United States Department of Transportation
Quick v. BNSF Railway Company
as 4:2024cv03064
Plaintiff:
Deon Quick
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Richardson v. BNSF Railway Company
as 3:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Richardson
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
