Cases 1 - 10 of 847
Shotwell v. Chavez-Epperson, et al.
as 24-3459
Plaintiff:
MANUEL EUGENE SHOTWELL
Defendant:
CHAVEZ-EPPERSON, DELANEY, E. MEDINA and others
Cartwright v. Minot, City of et al
as 1:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Walter William Cartwright, III
Defendant:
Minot, City of, Ashley Olson, Kristian Shaide and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Boles v. Fisher et al.
as 3:2024cv00786
Plaintiff:
Reno Marcus Boles
Defendant:
Detective Richard B. Fisher and Toledo Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bell v. City of Hopkinsville, Kentucky et al
as 5:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Daron Darnell Bell
Defendant:
City of Hopkinsville, Kentucky, Richard Boling, Eric Pacheo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Boles v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00830
Plaintiff:
Candace Boles
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
ESTATE OF WILLIE EASON-JACKSON et al v. LLT MANAGEMENT LLC et al
as 3:2024cv05212
Defendant:
LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, LTL MANAGEMENT LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC and others
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF WILLIE EASON-JACKSON and ADRIAN BOLES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bong v. Brown, et al.
as 24-2208
Plaintiff:
JILL BONG
Defendant:
OREGON EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT, OREGON SCHOOL BOARDS ASSOCIATION, KATE BROWN, in both her individual and official capacity as Governor of the State of Oregon and others
Boling v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv00980
Plaintiff:
Lester Boling
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
