Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Bolling v. Third Lenox Terrace
as 1:2026cv06297
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bolling
Defendant:
Third Lenox Terrace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Calaway et al v. Forster, LPC et al
as 6:2026cv01452
Plaintiff:
Nicole A. Calaway and David J.W. Calaway
Defendant:
Jennifer Forster, LPC, Rachel Woods, Tyler Wampler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meyers v. Whitt et al
as 7:2026cv00526
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Robert Whitt, Manager of Big Stone, VA U.S. Postal Service, U.S. Postal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Sykes et al
as 7:2026cv00525
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Ms. P. Sykes, B. Bolling, Amee Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Sykes et al
as 7:2026cv00488
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Ms. P. Sykes, ROSP Operations Manager - A.D.A., Coordinator PRCA Mgr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Embaye v. Blanche
as 26-60430
Petitioner:
Daniel Bolled Embaye
Respondent:
Todd Wallace Blanche, Acting U.S. Attorney General
Humes v. Bolling et al
as 1:2026cv06207
Plaintiff:
Chase Ryan Humes
Defendant:
Bolling and Roth
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Duncan et al
as 7:2026cv00416
Petitioner:
David Meyers
Respondent:
A. Duncan, D. Anderson, M. Pozeg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Meyers v. Bolling et al
as 7:2026cv00411
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
B. Bolling, E. Shirks, Major J.B. Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Sykes et al
as 7:2026cv00383
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
P. Sykes, Intel Officer A. Casle, Intel Officer E. Shirks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
