Cases 1 - 10 of 2,980
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Booker v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01957
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Booker
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc., American Zurich Insurance Co., Sedgwick Claims Management and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - E.R.I.S.A
Michael Dobson v. Dr. Thompson
as 24-6403
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DOBSON
Defendant:
DR. THOMPSON, HAROLD W. CLARKE, STEVEN HERRICK and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21519
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Booker v. Covidien, LP et al
as 1:2024cv11062
Plaintiff:
Philip Booker
Defendant:
Covidien, LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Booker v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01924
Plaintiff:
Philip Booker
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
US v. Adrian Gambrell-Booker
as 24-4207
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ADRIAN MARKEESE GAMBRELL-BOOKER, a/k/a AD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00918
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Benshoof v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Seattle
as 24-1958
Petitioner:
KURT BENSHOOF
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Interested Party:
FREYA BRIER, MOSHE ADMON, CITY OF SEATTLE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
