Cases 21 - 30 of 192
Chestnut v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP)
as 1:2022cv02701
Petitioner:
Raymond Chestnut, Raymond Edward Chestnut and Ray Chestnut
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Prigmore v. FCI Beaumont Staff
as 5:2022cv00331
Plaintiff:
William Prigmore
Defendant:
FCI Beaumont Staff, Warden Bryan K. Dobbs, Multiple Unknown Agents of the BOP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
DAKOTA v. BOP
as 1:2022cv00639
Plaintiff:
SARFATY J. DAKOTA
Defendant:
BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
JAMES v. BOP
as 1:2022cv00640
Plaintiff:
KEITH ORBIE JAMES
Defendant:
BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
Chestnut v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP)
as 1:2022cv02420
Petitioner:
Raymond Edward Chestnut, Ray Chestnut and Raymond Chestnut
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. BOP
as 1:2022cv00413
Petitioner:
ROBERT EARL WILLIAMS
Respondent:
BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. U. S. Attorney General
as 22-6391
Plaintiff / Appellant:
(CHIEF) COL. MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee:
U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and DIRECTOR, F. BOP
Gary Hancock v. Nancy Smith
as 22-6352
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARY WARREN HANCOCK, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
NANCY SMITH, Health care provider, RN BENJAMIN PARKER, DEBBIE SAYLOR and others
Owl Feather-Gorbey v. F-BOP Designation Center
as 5:2022cv00131
Petitioner:
(Chief) Col. Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey
Respondent:
Administrator F-BOP Designation Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
