Cases 21 - 30 of 160
JAMES v. BOP CENTRAL OFFICE, COLEMAN USP-1
as 1:2022cv00261
Petitioner:
CALVIN JAMES
Respondent:
BOP CENTRAL OFFICE, COLEMAN USP-1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmera Pineda v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv00193
Plaintiff:
Juvenal Ovidio Palmera Pineda, Juvenal Ovidio Ricardo Palmera Pineda and Simon Trinidad
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP), John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schulte v. Bureau of Prisons
as 22-84
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joshua Adam Schulte
Defendant / Appellee:
Timothy Valentine, John Barrett, Unknown BOP Officers that have not yet been identified and others
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Unknown Name and Unknown Number of Officers, 28 Employees of the Bureau of Prisons and others
Oliver v. FCI-Greenville et al
as 3:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
Sheldon Oliver
Defendant:
FCI-Greenville, BOP staff, E. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Coll v. Alamia et al
as 1:2021cv03712
Plaintiff:
Brian J. Coll
Defendant:
Hank Alamia, CO Thomas, CO Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. MOSER et al
as 3:2021cv00186
Plaintiff:
CHARLES PAUL SMITH
Defendant:
WARDEN V. MOSER, BOP DIRECTOR and BOP NER DIRECTOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Asplund v. Carver et al
as 1:2021cv00541
Plaintiff:
Janette M. Asplund
Defendant:
Warden Carver and BOP Director Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brandon v. Carver et al
as 1:2021cv00540
Plaintiff:
Shanna Brandon
Defendant:
Warden Carver and BOP Director Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Syslo v. Carver et al
as 1:2021cv00533
Plaintiff:
Taylor Syslo
Defendant:
Warden Carver and BOP Director Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barker v. Carver et al
as 1:2021cv00528
Plaintiff:
Belinda Barker
Defendant:
Warden Carver and BOP Director Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
