Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
USA v. Harris
as 24-10293
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Bradley J. Harris
HARRIS et al v. STEVENS et al
as 1:2024cv00572
Plaintiff: BRADLEY J. HARRIS
Defendant: JAMES STEVENS, INDIANA PAROLE DIST. NO 7, CWM SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. USA
as 3:2024cv00717
Petitioner: Bradley J Harris
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Harris v. Baysore
as 3:2024cv00125
Plaintiff: Bradley J. Harris
Defendant: Warden Baysore
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
HARRIS v. MIDWEST PSYCHOLOGICAL CENTER et al
as 1:2024cv00209
Plaintiff: BRADLEY J. HARRIS
Defendant: MIDWEST PSYCHOLOGICAL CENTER and JENNFER SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. DUBLIN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT. et al
as 1:2023cv00538
Plaintiff: BRADLEY J. HARRIS
Defendant: DUBLIN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT., DAN WICKER, LYNDON WICKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
HARRIS v. KUHN et al
as 1:2022cv01604
Plaintiff: BRADLEY J. HARRIS
Defendant: LARRY KUHN, VICTOR GUARISCO, HALEY JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Harris
as 22-10130
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: Bradley J. Harris
HARRIS et al v. LEMMON et al
as 1:2021cv02820
Plaintiff: BRADLEY J. HARRIS and CHRIS RADICAN
Defendant: BRUCE LEMMON, VICTOR GUARISCO and RON SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. INDIANA PAROLE BOARD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00956
Defendant: RIVER CITY POLYGRAPH, INDIANAPOLIS COUNSELING CENTER, LIBERTY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CORP. and others
Plaintiff: BRADLEY J. HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?