Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Taylor v. Glasscock et al
as 4:2023cv00147
Plaintiff:
Brandon Taylor
Defendant:
John Glasscock and St. Louis County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold v. Taylor et al
as 1:2022cv01098
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Arnold
Defendant:
Brandon Taylor and Ricky Finley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Duncan et al
as 3:2022cv00614
Plaintiff:
Aaron Davis
Defendant:
Tyler W.A. Duncan, Dale R. Osborn, Brandon Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL
as 3:2022cv03350
Plaintiff:
BRANDON TAYLOR
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Waybourn
as 4:2021cv00120
Plaintiff:
Brandon Taylor
Defendant:
Charles H Roach and Sharen Wilson
Respondent:
Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Flournoy v. Marion County et al
as 3:2020cv02762
Defendant:
Correctional Officer A. Wilson, Sergeant V. Clarke, Correctional Officer L. Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
William Flournoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Taylor v. Alardo et al
as 2:2019cv02241
Plaintiff:
Brandon Taylor and Brandon La'Shaun Taylor
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, D. Easley, J. Alardo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Taylor v. Amador County Public Defenders Office et al
as 2:2019cv02242
Plaintiff:
Brandon Taylor and Brandon La'Shaun Taylor
Defendant:
Amador County Conflict Defenders Office and Amador County Public Defenders Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Dennison
as 3:2018cv01456
Plaintiff:
Brandon Taylor
Defendant:
Warden Dennison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Rabito et al
as 1:2016cv11183
Plaintiff:
Brandon Taylor
Defendant:
Frank Rabito, Maurice Lee, William Warr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
