Cases 1 - 8 of 8
THE TORO COMPANY v. SMITH et al
as 1:2018cv03026
Defendant:
MATTHEW P. SMITH, MICHAEL D. FLOYD, R. SCOT JONES and others
Plaintiff:
THE TORO COMPANY
Lanz v. A Technological Advantage, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv03215
Plaintiff:
Gerald R. Lanz
Defendant:
A Technological Advantage, Inc., ATA Holdings, Inc., Brent L. Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Kevin Smith v. Jon E. Ozmint
as 09-7540
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN SMITH, a/k/a Royal Blackness, a/k/a Bar None
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT E. WARD, JAMES E. SLIGH, JR., JOHN LUNDEN and others
Defendant - None:
AEDEC INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED, JOHN DOE, ESTHER QUATTLEBAUM and others
Kevin Smith v. Jonathan Ozmint
as 09-6680
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
JONATHAN E. OZMINT, ROBERT E. WARD, JAMES E. SLIGH, JR. and others
Defendant - None:
ESTHER QUATTLEBAUM, DUNLAP, J. C. BROWN and others
Kevin Smith v. Jon Ozmint
as 08-6865
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN SMITH, a/k/a Royal Blackness, a/k/a Bar None
Defendant - Appellee:
JON OZMINT, ROBERT E. WARD, JAMES E. SLIGH, JR. and others
Defendant - None:
ESTHER QUATTLEBAUM, DENNIS DUNLAP, J. C. BROWN and others
Lonnie Strandlund, etc., et al v. William Hawley, etc, et al
as 07-3617
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Strandlund
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Christopher Holscher, Jeremiah Brendsel, and and Richard Krawiecki
Defendant - Appellee:
William Hawley, Brent Lindgren, Mille Lacs County Sheriff, and and Mille Lacs County
USA v. Pickett, James
as 03-3018
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
James Joseph Pickett
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
American Civil Liberties Union of the National Captial Area
Amicus Curiae:
Glen Alonso, Roy C. Anderson, Troy M. Arida and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
