Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Peter R. Tia v. Core Civic et al
as 5:2023cv02545
Defendant:
LDS, Core Civic, the City of San Bernardino and others
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schukar et al v. Kenosha County et al
as 2:2023cv00880
Plaintiff:
alyssa schukar and scott olson
Defendant:
Kenosha County, David G Beth, City of Kenosha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bond v. Verdecia et al
as 3:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
Maurice Wesley Bond
Defendant:
Rosario Verdecia, Brian "Doe" and Rachel "Doe"
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ortiz v. 5 Star Valet LLC et al
as 1:2022cv06871
Plaintiff:
Jaime Ortiz
Defendant:
5 Star Valet LLC, Brian "Doe", John "Doe" and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Tolpin v. BJs Wholesale Club, Inc.
as 2:2018cv05120
Defendant:
Brian "Doe" and BJs Wholesale Club, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Tolpin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Glenn v. Johnson State Prison et al
as 3:2017cv00059
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Glenn
Defendant:
Johnson State Prison, K. Williams, Wicker Humphries and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chen v. Arirang Hibachi Steak House, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv05603
Defendant:
Robert "Doe", Arirang Hibachi Steak House, Inc., Brian "Doe" and others
Plaintiff:
Jang Fang Chen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1152
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Yau v. Geisha Asian Cuisine, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02207
Plaintiff:
Chi Ming Yau
Defendant:
Geisha Asian Cuisine, Inc. , Sandra Xiu Xia Zheng and Brian Doe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1277
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
