Cases 21 - 30 of 56
Walker v. Colvin
as 7:2016cv00070
Plaintiff:
Brian Walker
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Walker v. Colvin
as 2:2015cv13343
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Brian Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Byron Mills, et al v. Eagle US 2, L.L.C.
as 15-90096
Plaintiff - Respondent:
BYRON MILLS, on behalf of his minor child, GM, JEREMIAH MILLS, on behalf of his minor child, EM, TERRY L. MORGAN, on behalf of his minor children, CM and VM and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
EAGLE US 2, L.L.C.
Crystal Mott, et al v. Eagle US 2, L.L.C.
as 15-90070
Plaintiff - Respondent:
CRYSTAL MOTT, sa legal tutrix on behalf of the minor children JV and KV, BRIAN WALKER, SR., as legal tutor on behalf of the minor child BW(1), MELYNNIE DADE, as legal tutrix on behalf of the minor child TW and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
EAGLE US 2, L.L.C.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02710
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Mills et al v. Eagle U S 2 L L C et al
as 2:2015cv00750
Plaintiff:
Byron Mills , Jeremiah Mills , Terry L Morgan and others
Defendant:
Eagle U S 2 L L C and David L Ardoin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Mott et al v. Eagle U S 2 L L C
as 2:2015cv00706
Plaintiff:
Crystal Mott , Brian Walker, Sr , Melynnie Dade and others
Defendant:
Eagle U S 2 L L C and David L Ardoin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walker et al v. Modernica, Inc.
as 1:2015mc00027
Movant:
Brian Walker and Sally Wishang
Respondent:
Modernica, Inc.
in re: Depositions
as 1:2015mc00006
Respondent:
Modernica, Inc.
Movant:
Brian Walker and Sally Wisbang
King v. Hill
as 14-5073
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DONALD FRANCIS KING
Defendant - Appellant:
LAMONT HILL
Defendant:
TULSA COUNTY SHERIFF 'S DEPARTMENT, STANLEY GLANZ, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Tulsa County, ALLEN GOODSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
