Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Guan v. O'Grady
as 23-1067
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alice Guan
Defendant / Appellee:
Liam O'Grady, as an individual and as Judge for the Eastern District of Virginia, Jen Kim, James C. Clark, as an individual and as a Judge and others
Guan v. O'Grady et al
as 3:2023cv00847
Plaintiff:
Alice Guan
Defendant:
Liam O'Grady, Jen Kim, James C. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Guan v. O'Grady et al
as 3:2023cv00398
Plaintiff:
Alice Guan
Defendant:
Liam O'Grady, Jen Kim, James C. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
AZUBUKO v. ZOBEL et al
as 1:2020cv10638
Defendant:
DENNIS MICHAEL FISHER, ROBERT BRUCE KING, JOSEPH F. WEIS, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
Chukwuma E. Azubuko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
AZUBUKO v. ZOBEL et al
as 1:2020cv00590
Defendant:
DENNIS MICHAEL FISHER, ROBERT BRUCE KING, JOSEPH F. WEIS, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
CHUKWUMA E. AZUBUKO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Smith v. Town of South Hill et al
as 3:2019cv00046
Defendant:
Police Officers 1-20 John and Jane Doe, Ofc. M. Waters, Inv. B.J. Mull and others
Plaintiff:
Violet A. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen King, et al v. Eric Taylor, et al
as 11-5917
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALLEN KING, as Adminstrators of the Estate of Roger King and BRUCE KING, as Administrators of the Estate of Roger King
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC TAYLOR, in his individual capacity as a Kentucky State Trooper
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, dba Kentucky State Police
King et al v. Taylor et al
as 5:2010cv00096
Plaintiff:
Allen King and Bruce King
Defendant:
Eric Taylor and Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
