Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,086
ConvergeOne, Inc. v. Waterfield Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00595
Plaintiff: ConvergeOne, Inc.
Defendant: Waterfield Technologies, Inc., Klaus Hillmann, Frank Bryant and others
USA v. Bo Hostettler
as 24-3403
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: BO BRYANT HOSTETTLER
Reeners v. McCormick et al
as 3:2024cv00555
Plaintiff: Patrick Jayson Reeners
Defendant: Nekeisha Bryant McCormick, Gregory Traylor, Alegra Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bryant v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02090
Plaintiff: Angelia Evette Bryant
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Brandon Bryant
as 24-3360
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: BRANDON BRYANT
Bryant et al v. Wilder et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00031
Plaintiff: Randy L. Bryant and Ann W.E. Bryant
Defendant: Kimberly Wilder, David Wilder and Attorney Matthew Chandler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Lewis v. City of Columbus, Ohio et al
as 2:2024cv01841
Plaintiff: Estate of Donovan L. Lewis
Defendant: City of Columbus, Ohio and Chief Elaine Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bryant v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01533
Plaintiff: Toshiba Bryant
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Owens v. TN Dept of Corrections
as 1:2024cv01069
Plaintiff: Roderick M Owens
Defendant: Tennessee Department of Corrections, Linda R. Thomas, Ricky Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryan v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2024cv10672
Plaintiff: Sean Ryan and Sean Michael Ryan
Defendant: Michigan, State of, Bureau of Health Care Services, Heidi Washington and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?