Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Jadama v. Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Director of et al
as 2:2022cv12682
Petitioner:
Buba Jadama
Respondent:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Director of and others
Sealed Defendant 2 v. USA
as 5:2021cv01085
Petitioner:
Buba Jadama
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
United States of America v. Alequin (Estel)
as 17-3856
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ernesto Alequin, AKA Cano, Buba Jadama, Jamel Febus, AKA Shrimp and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Luis Estela, AKA Salud
United States of America v. Alequin (Jadama)
as 16-2846
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ernesto Alequin, AKA Cano, Jamel Febus, AKA Shrimp, Alonzo Thomas and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Buba Jadama
Buba et al v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company Americas
as 1:2016cv10421
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Buba and Eugenia Z. Buba
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company Americas and Nationstar Mortgage LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-1163
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv03241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv03243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Magnolia Intellectual Property, LLC v. Trawally et al
as 1:2012cv07102
Plaintiff:
Magnolia Intellectual Property, LLC
Defendant:
Buba Trawally and Apple Cafe Bakery Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
CARRASQUILLO v. PEREZ et al
as 2:2012cv01844
Plaintiff:
JOSE CARRASQUILLO
Defendant:
EDGARDO PEREZ, RONALD BUBAS, DANIELLE LYNN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
