Cases 1 - 10 of 155
Balla v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01436
Plaintiff:
Steven Balla
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Balla v. Masterbrand Cabinets Inc
as 3:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
Adrianne M. Balla
Defendant:
MasterBrand Cabinets Inc d/b/a MasterBrand Cabinets LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
LENTO LAW GROUP, P.C. v. LEWIS et al
as 2:2024cv10031
Plaintiff:
Lento Law Group, P.C.
Defendant:
Ladel Lewis, Linda Ann Pohly, FLORENDA LEE-HALL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
LENTO LAW GROUP, P.C. v. LEWIS et al
as 1:2023cv20985
Plaintiff:
LENTO LAW GROUP, P.C.
Defendant:
LADEL LEWIS, LINDA ANN POHLY, FLORENDA LEE-HALL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Bah v. Garland
as 23-9590
Petitioner:
SAIKU BALLA BAH
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
BALLAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv14569
Plaintiff:
MARK BALLAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MASLATON-TARRAB et al v. STRONG-LOMAX et al
as 1:2023cv20666
Plaintiff:
SOPHIE S MASLATON-TARRAB, LILIANE BALLAS-HALABI and SOPHIE S. MASLATON-TARRAB
Defendant:
SARAH STRONG-LOMAX and GRACE TEAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Brown et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv04190
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Brown, David Daniel Ackman, Richard Acosta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Brown et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00906
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Brown, David Daniel Ackman, Richard Acosta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
